مي محمد كمال محمد عبدالفتاح
مدرس مساعد
Comparative study of different methods for colistin susceptibility in Carbapenem Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii
• 2026
معلومات البحث
المؤلفون
Soheir Abdelrahman Abdelsamie , Sahar Mohammed Fayed , Inas Abd Elmonem Ahmed , Mai Mohamed Kamal
الكلمات المفتاحية
Not Available
المجلة العلمية
Not Available
الناشر
Not Available
المجلد
Not Available
العدد
Not Available
الصفحات
Not Available
publication.type
International
رابط البحث
Not Available
المواد المرفقة
Not Available
الملخص
Background: Various nosocomial illnesses have been linked to Acinetobacter
baumannii, a prominent nosocomial pathogen. For the treatment of infections caused
by multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacilli, particularly the very resistant A.
baumannii, colistin is now regarded as a treatment of last resort. In a time when MDR
Gram-negative bacteria are becoming more prevalent and colistin resistance is also
rising, a precise technique for measuring colistin's antimicrobial susceptibility is
essential. The aim of this study is to evaluate the phenotypic colistin susceptibility
testing methods in carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii (CRAB) and to detect the
underlying molecular presence of mcr-1 gene alongside these phenotypic methods.
Methods: Gradient diffusion (E-test) and automated systems (Vitek-2, BD Phoenix™)
were used to examine 50 non-repeated A. baumannii isolates, and the outcomes were
compared to the reference broth microdilution (BMD) method which was performed
according to ISO 20776-1 guidelines. Additionally, PCR was used to find the plasmidencoded mcr-1 gene. Results: The reference BMD method yielded 22% resistant
isolates. E-test showed highest relative accuracy with 96% categorical agreement (CA),
86% essential agreement (EA), and 18.18% very major errors (VME), with no major
errors (ME). Vitek-2 compact and BD Phoenix™ showed identical performance with a
CA of 88%, EA of 76%, VME rates of 45.45%, and ME rates of 2.56%. Mcr-1 gene
was found in 12% of isolates and was positive in 45.5% of colistin resistant strains.
Conclusion: To fight against CRAB, laboratories should prioritize MIC-based
accuracy over convenience to guide life-saving therapy. Compared to BMD as the
reference method, E-test offers the highest relative accuracy followed by automated systems.
baumannii, a prominent nosocomial pathogen. For the treatment of infections caused
by multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacilli, particularly the very resistant A.
baumannii, colistin is now regarded as a treatment of last resort. In a time when MDR
Gram-negative bacteria are becoming more prevalent and colistin resistance is also
rising, a precise technique for measuring colistin's antimicrobial susceptibility is
essential. The aim of this study is to evaluate the phenotypic colistin susceptibility
testing methods in carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii (CRAB) and to detect the
underlying molecular presence of mcr-1 gene alongside these phenotypic methods.
Methods: Gradient diffusion (E-test) and automated systems (Vitek-2, BD Phoenix™)
were used to examine 50 non-repeated A. baumannii isolates, and the outcomes were
compared to the reference broth microdilution (BMD) method which was performed
according to ISO 20776-1 guidelines. Additionally, PCR was used to find the plasmidencoded mcr-1 gene. Results: The reference BMD method yielded 22% resistant
isolates. E-test showed highest relative accuracy with 96% categorical agreement (CA),
86% essential agreement (EA), and 18.18% very major errors (VME), with no major
errors (ME). Vitek-2 compact and BD Phoenix™ showed identical performance with a
CA of 88%, EA of 76%, VME rates of 45.45%, and ME rates of 2.56%. Mcr-1 gene
was found in 12% of isolates and was positive in 45.5% of colistin resistant strains.
Conclusion: To fight against CRAB, laboratories should prioritize MIC-based
accuracy over convenience to guide life-saving therapy. Compared to BMD as the
reference method, E-test offers the highest relative accuracy followed by automated systems.
