محمد شحته عبد الهادى
مدرس
Comparative study between microwave ablation versus radio frequency ablation of great saphenous vein in primary varicose veins
• 2025
معلومات البحث
المؤلفون
Mohamed Shehta Abd Elhady, MSc; El-Sayed A. Abd El-Mabood, MD; Mostafa Baioumy Abdel Wahab, MD; Mohammed A. Waly, MD
الكلمات المفتاحية
Not Available
المجلة العلمية
Not Available
الناشر
Not Available
المجلد
Not Available
العدد
Not Available
الصفحات
Not Available
publication.type
Local
رابط البحث
Not Available
المواد المرفقة
Not Available
الملخص
Purposes: Find out advantages & Efficacy of EMA Versus RFA in treatment Of primary varicose veins.
Background: Varicose veins treatment places a considerable annoying problem on the medical system, with long waiting time for operation in the public hospital system. Both EMA and RFA allow efficient treatment of many patients on out-patient basis.
Patients and methods: This prospective randomized interventional study included 40 patients diagnosed with GSV reflux and patients were randomly allocated by using a computer generated random number table (Central Randomization System) into one of the two parallel treatment groups in a 1:1 ratio according to the intervention performed; Group I: Endovenous Microwave Ablation (EMA); (N=20 (50%)), Group II: radio frequency ablation (RFA): (N=20 (50%)).All patients underwent clinical evaluation, routine hematological tests, Venous duplex of both lower limbs. Follow-up period was for 12-months
Background: Varicose veins treatment places a considerable annoying problem on the medical system, with long waiting time for operation in the public hospital system. Both EMA and RFA allow efficient treatment of many patients on out-patient basis.
Patients and methods: This prospective randomized interventional study included 40 patients diagnosed with GSV reflux and patients were randomly allocated by using a computer generated random number table (Central Randomization System) into one of the two parallel treatment groups in a 1:1 ratio according to the intervention performed; Group I: Endovenous Microwave Ablation (EMA); (N=20 (50%)), Group II: radio frequency ablation (RFA): (N=20 (50%)).All patients underwent clinical evaluation, routine hematological tests, Venous duplex of both lower limbs. Follow-up period was for 12-months
