هبه جمال علي علي الداعوس
مدرس مساعد
RESPONSE OF PULMONARY FUNCTIONS TO INSPIRATORY MUSCLES TRAINING VERSUS PNEUMATIC COMPRESSION IN COPD PATIENTS
• 2023
معلومات البحث
المؤلفون
HEBA G.A. ELDAOUS, M.SC.*; NAGWA M. H. BADR, Ph.D.*; MARWA E.
ELNAGGAR, M.D.** and, ALI M. A. ISMAIL Ph.D.*
الكلمات المفتاحية
Not Available
المجلة العلمية
Not Available
الناشر
Not Available
المجلد
Not Available
العدد
Not Available
الصفحات
Not Available
publication.type
Local
رابط البحث
Not Available
المواد المرفقة
Not Available
الملخص
Back ground: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), which is a
leading cause of mortality and morbidity worldwide, is the main cause of persistent
obstruction of the airway leading to respiratory muscle weakness.
Aim of this study: comparing the response of pulmonary functions to resisted
inspiratory muscles training versus pneumatic compression in COPD patients.
Patients and Methods: randomized prospective clinical study included 40
patients with moderate and sever COPD. They were recruited from outpatient clinic
of chest disease, Benha University Hospital; patients were randomly assigned into
two equal groups, group A received Inspiratory Muscle Training (30%of maximum
inspiratory pressure) and group B received Pneumatic Compression with abdominal
sleeve (30% of one- repetition maximum). All patients trained 3 times per week for
12 weeks. Respiratory function tests were compared before interventions and post
12 weeks.
Results: comparison between groups post treatment revealed a significant
increase in FEV1, FVC, PEFR, FEF25-75% and 6 MWT of group A compared with
that of group B (p < 0.05).
Conclusions: inspiratory muscle training and pneumatic compression improve
pulmonary functions and pneumatic compression can be considered as an effective
component for pulmonary rehabilitation in COPD patients
leading cause of mortality and morbidity worldwide, is the main cause of persistent
obstruction of the airway leading to respiratory muscle weakness.
Aim of this study: comparing the response of pulmonary functions to resisted
inspiratory muscles training versus pneumatic compression in COPD patients.
Patients and Methods: randomized prospective clinical study included 40
patients with moderate and sever COPD. They were recruited from outpatient clinic
of chest disease, Benha University Hospital; patients were randomly assigned into
two equal groups, group A received Inspiratory Muscle Training (30%of maximum
inspiratory pressure) and group B received Pneumatic Compression with abdominal
sleeve (30% of one- repetition maximum). All patients trained 3 times per week for
12 weeks. Respiratory function tests were compared before interventions and post
12 weeks.
Results: comparison between groups post treatment revealed a significant
increase in FEV1, FVC, PEFR, FEF25-75% and 6 MWT of group A compared with
that of group B (p < 0.05).
Conclusions: inspiratory muscle training and pneumatic compression improve
pulmonary functions and pneumatic compression can be considered as an effective
component for pulmonary rehabilitation in COPD patients
