حسين جمال حسين الجوهرى
أستاذ
Comparative Study Between Enhanced Recovery After Surgery and Conventional Perioperative Care in Elective Colorectal Surgery
• 2017
معلومات البحث
المؤلفون
Hussein Gamal Elgohary,1 Mostaf Baiuomy Abdelwahab,1 Ashraf
Mohamed Abdelkader,1 Mohamed Hamed Abdel-Fattah,2 Ahmed
Ahmed Mosaad2
الكلمات المفتاحية
Not Available
المجلة العلمية
Not Available
الناشر
Not Available
المجلد
Not Available
العدد
Not Available
الصفحات
Not Available
publication.type
International
رابط البحث
Not Available
المواد المرفقة
Not Available
الملخص
Objective: A joint research between departments of general surgery and anesthesiology, aims to
examine the feasibility and safety of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in elective colorectal
surgery.
Patients & Methods: The study included 80 patients candidates for abdominal colorectal surgery,
randomly divided into two groups; group C contains 40 patients managed perioperatively through
conventional management procedures and group E contains 40 patients managed according to
ERAS protocols. Patients in both groups were monitored throughout the perioperative period.
Collected data includes compliance data, operative data, PO complications, bowel recovery as
well as the length of ICU and hospital stay.
Results: The overall compliance rates with the ERAS protocols was 80 %. No significant
difference between both groups concerning operative time. Pain scores were significantly low (pvalue
examine the feasibility and safety of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in elective colorectal
surgery.
Patients & Methods: The study included 80 patients candidates for abdominal colorectal surgery,
randomly divided into two groups; group C contains 40 patients managed perioperatively through
conventional management procedures and group E contains 40 patients managed according to
ERAS protocols. Patients in both groups were monitored throughout the perioperative period.
Collected data includes compliance data, operative data, PO complications, bowel recovery as
well as the length of ICU and hospital stay.
Results: The overall compliance rates with the ERAS protocols was 80 %. No significant
difference between both groups concerning operative time. Pain scores were significantly low (pvalue