شريف مصطفى توفيق جاويش
مدرس مساعد
Assessing the efficacy of pre-trained large language models in analyzing autonomous vehicle field test disengagements
Accident Analysis & Prevention • 2025
معلومات البحث
المؤلفون
Melika Ansarinejad; Sherif M Gaweesh; Mohamed M Ahmed
الكلمات المفتاحية
Not Available
المجلة العلمية
Accident Analysis & Prevention
الناشر
Not Available
المجلد
Not Available
العدد
Not Available
الصفحات
Not Available
publication.type
International
رابط البحث
Not Available
المواد المرفقة
Not Available
الملخص
This study evaluates the efficacy of pre-trained large language models (LLMs) in analyzing disengagement reports of Levels 2–3 autonomous vehicle (AV) field tests, utilizing data provided from California Department of Motor Vehicles. Disengagement reports document instances where autonomous vehicles, tested under the Autonomous Vehicle Tester (AVT) and AVT Driverless Programs, transition from autonomous to manual control. These disengagements occur when human intervention is required due to incidents or limitations in the operational design domain that prevent AVs from functioning properly. Understanding factors leading to disengagements is pivotal for assessing AV performance and guiding infrastructure owners and operators (IOOs) about modifications needed. Manual approaches for analysis of the disengagement data are labor-intensive and prone to human error. Our research investigates the capability of LLMs to automate this analysis, focusing on identifying patterns, categorizing disengagement causes, and extracting meaningful insights from extensive datasets. GPT-4o as an LLM was employed to analyze the disengagement reports. The study aims to measure the accuracy, efficiency, and reliability of these models in comparison to traditional techniques. The application of LLMs demonstrated significant potential in identifying insights from the disengagement dataset, while effectively processing the textual data, achieving an accuracy of 87%. Several data limitations were encountered, including inconsistencies in disengagement descriptions from different manufacturers, which posed challenges to standardizing the analysis. Additionally, the disengagement reports offered limited details on the specific causes of disengagements and the surrounding conditions, restricting the depth of insights that could be drawn. Despite these challenges, our findings indicate that LLMs can substantially enhance the speed and precision of analyzing AV disengagement reports, offering valuable insights, while being cost-effective, that can inform further research and development in AV technology and safety protocols.
