Fatma Mohammed Alfeky
Asst. Professor
Validity And Reliability Of The Arabic Version Of WOMAC Osteoarthritis Index In Egyptian Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis.
Journal of Pharmaceutical Negative Results. • 2022
Publication Information
Authors
Reda K. Abd Elrazik , Fatma M. Alfeky , Adel ME Zedan , Sara Mohamed Samir
Keywords
Arabic Version; Egyptian; Knee Osteoarthritis; Reliability; Validity; WOMAC
Journal
Journal of Pharmaceutical Negative Results.
Publisher
Journal of Pharmaceutical Negative Results.
Volume
13
Issue
7
Pages
4459-4465
publication.type
International
Paper Link
Open Link
Supplementary Materials
Fatma Mohammed Alfeky_WOMAC.pdf
Abstract
Background: Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) Osteoarthritis index is a multidimensional self-reported
disease-specific questionnaire that assesses pain, stiffness and physical disability in patients with Osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee
joint. Purpose: The aim of the study was to assess validity and reliability of the Arabic Version of WOMAC Osteoarthritis index
in Egyptians with knee OA. Methods: The Arabic version of WOMAC Osteoarthritis Index was administered to fifty Egyptian
knee OA. Range of motion (ROM) of knee flexion and radiographic severity were assessed for all patients by digital goniometer
and X-Ray, respectively. Validity was assessed by relating the WOMAC to knee flexion range of motion and radiographic severity
using spearman correlation coefficient. Besides, internal consistency and reliability were evaluated by Cronbach’s alpha and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), respectively.
Results: Arabic Version of WOMAC Osteoarthritis Index showed weak correlation with knee flexion range of motion (rho=-0.36,
P=0.037) and little non-significant correlation with radiographic severity. Cronbach’s alphas were 0.74–0.82. Test–retest reliability
was 0.58–0.693.
Conclusion: Arabic Version of WOMAC Osteoarthritis Index is a reliable but less valid index for use in Egyptian patients with
knee OA.
disease-specific questionnaire that assesses pain, stiffness and physical disability in patients with Osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee
joint. Purpose: The aim of the study was to assess validity and reliability of the Arabic Version of WOMAC Osteoarthritis index
in Egyptians with knee OA. Methods: The Arabic version of WOMAC Osteoarthritis Index was administered to fifty Egyptian
knee OA. Range of motion (ROM) of knee flexion and radiographic severity were assessed for all patients by digital goniometer
and X-Ray, respectively. Validity was assessed by relating the WOMAC to knee flexion range of motion and radiographic severity
using spearman correlation coefficient. Besides, internal consistency and reliability were evaluated by Cronbach’s alpha and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), respectively.
Results: Arabic Version of WOMAC Osteoarthritis Index showed weak correlation with knee flexion range of motion (rho=-0.36,
P=0.037) and little non-significant correlation with radiographic severity. Cronbach’s alphas were 0.74–0.82. Test–retest reliability
was 0.58–0.693.
Conclusion: Arabic Version of WOMAC Osteoarthritis Index is a reliable but less valid index for use in Egyptian patients with
knee OA.