Gehad Wageh Fetoh Soliman
Asst. Lecturer
Diagnostic Value of Spinal Ultrasound in Diagnosis of Spinal Anomalies in Pediatrics in Comparison to MRI
• 2023
Publication Information
Authors
Hamada M. Khater, Sherif A. Elrefaey, Gehad W. Soliman
Keywords
Not Available
Journal
Not Available
Publisher
Not Available
Volume
Not Available
Issue
Not Available
Pages
Not Available
publication.type
Local
Paper Link
Not Available
Supplementary Materials
Not Available
Abstract
Background: Pediatric spinal anomalies often necessitate
accurate and timely diagnosis for effective management.
This study aimed to assess the diagnostic value of spinal
ultrasound as initial modality for screening of pediatrics
spinal anomalies in comparison to MRI. Methods: This
cross-sectional study was conducted on pediatric patients
suspected of spinal cord disorders. A detailed clinical
examination, spinal ultrasound using high-frequency linear
array transducers, and MRI scans were performed on all
participants. Results: The 23.44 ± 32.02 days, 93.33% were
less than 60 days old. Females comprised 68.9%, males
22.2%, and 8.9% had ambiguous genitalia. Common
clinical presentations included back swelling (57.78%), hair
tuft (31.11%), and sacral dimple (24.44%). Most anomalies
involved the lumbosacral region (80%). Ultrasonography
exhibited high diagnostic validity, showing perfect
agreement with MRI for myelomeningocele, dorsal dermal
sinus, tethered cord, myelocele, disyomatomyelia with
segmental spinal dysgenesis, dermal sinus, myelocystocele,
and retethering of the cord (Kappa > 0.9). However, for
caudal regression syndrome, the Kappa value was 0.656,
indicating moderate agreement. The overall diagnostic
accuracy of ultrasound compared to MRI was above
95.56% across findings. Conclusion: Spinal ultrasound
demonstrates substantial diagnostic accuracy comparable to
MRI in identifying pediatric spinal anomalies, particularly
for various conditions such as myelomeningocele, dorsal dermal sinus, and tethered
cord.
accurate and timely diagnosis for effective management.
This study aimed to assess the diagnostic value of spinal
ultrasound as initial modality for screening of pediatrics
spinal anomalies in comparison to MRI. Methods: This
cross-sectional study was conducted on pediatric patients
suspected of spinal cord disorders. A detailed clinical
examination, spinal ultrasound using high-frequency linear
array transducers, and MRI scans were performed on all
participants. Results: The 23.44 ± 32.02 days, 93.33% were
less than 60 days old. Females comprised 68.9%, males
22.2%, and 8.9% had ambiguous genitalia. Common
clinical presentations included back swelling (57.78%), hair
tuft (31.11%), and sacral dimple (24.44%). Most anomalies
involved the lumbosacral region (80%). Ultrasonography
exhibited high diagnostic validity, showing perfect
agreement with MRI for myelomeningocele, dorsal dermal
sinus, tethered cord, myelocele, disyomatomyelia with
segmental spinal dysgenesis, dermal sinus, myelocystocele,
and retethering of the cord (Kappa > 0.9). However, for
caudal regression syndrome, the Kappa value was 0.656,
indicating moderate agreement. The overall diagnostic
accuracy of ultrasound compared to MRI was above
95.56% across findings. Conclusion: Spinal ultrasound
demonstrates substantial diagnostic accuracy comparable to
MRI in identifying pediatric spinal anomalies, particularly
for various conditions such as myelomeningocele, dorsal dermal sinus, and tethered
cord.
