Ahmed kamal Eldein Abbass
Lecturer
Effectiveness of Double Cervical Cerclage in Women with at Least One Previous Pregnancy Loss in the Second Trimester
evidance based women health journal • 2024
Publication Information
Authors
Ahmed K Abbas, Wael Naeem, Heba Mohamed Khattab, Ali A Bendary
Keywords
recurrent pregnancy loss ,cerclage, mid trimester
Journal
evidance based women health journal
Publisher
10.21608/ebwhj.2024.259001.1284
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
77-82
publication.type
Local
Paper Link
Not Available
Supplementary Materials
Not Available
Abstract
Recurrent pregnancy failure in second trimester is defined as three or more losses although most authors consider clinical treatment with 2 consecutive miscarriages at 14-18 weeks of gestation. Preterm births are more likely to occur in future pregnancies for women who have previously experienced cervical incompetence.
Objective: The study's objective was to determine whether double cervical cerclage had any impact on perinatal outcomes and preterm delivery prevention in women who had experienced second-trimester foetal loss.
Materials and Methods: This interventional prospective randomized controlled study included patients who attended the Outpatient Clinic with suspected cervical incompetence either by previous obstetric history or by ultrasound examination with gestational age between 14 and 18 weeks. The patients were randomly allocated into 2 groups; group 1 included 20 patients who had traditional modified MacDonald operation using a 5 mm mersilene tape in the middle third of the cervix and group 2 included 20 matched patients who had double cervical cerclage with two purse-string sutures using two 5 mm mersilene tapes; in the upper and lower third of the cervix.
Results: There was no significant difference between the double cervical and single cervical group regarding weight of the baby at birth, GA at delivery, abortion, mode of delivery and admission of baby to NICU. There was no significnat difference between both groups regarding hematuria, hospital stay (hours) and neonatal death after operation (p > 0.05).
Conclusion: Women with cervical incompetence who undergo double cervical cerclage do not experience better perinatal or maternal outcomes.
Objective: The study's objective was to determine whether double cervical cerclage had any impact on perinatal outcomes and preterm delivery prevention in women who had experienced second-trimester foetal loss.
Materials and Methods: This interventional prospective randomized controlled study included patients who attended the Outpatient Clinic with suspected cervical incompetence either by previous obstetric history or by ultrasound examination with gestational age between 14 and 18 weeks. The patients were randomly allocated into 2 groups; group 1 included 20 patients who had traditional modified MacDonald operation using a 5 mm mersilene tape in the middle third of the cervix and group 2 included 20 matched patients who had double cervical cerclage with two purse-string sutures using two 5 mm mersilene tapes; in the upper and lower third of the cervix.
Results: There was no significant difference between the double cervical and single cervical group regarding weight of the baby at birth, GA at delivery, abortion, mode of delivery and admission of baby to NICU. There was no significnat difference between both groups regarding hematuria, hospital stay (hours) and neonatal death after operation (p > 0.05).
Conclusion: Women with cervical incompetence who undergo double cervical cerclage do not experience better perinatal or maternal outcomes.
