Ayat Mohamed Hassan Taha
Asst. Lecturer
An Experimental Study on Durability Properties of Reactive Powder Concrete Containing Silica Fume and Fly Ash as Supplementary Cementitious Materials
Engineering Journal Mansoura Engineering Journal • 2025
Publication Information
Authors
Ayat M. Taha*, Mohamed H. Makhlouf, Khaled M. El-Sayed, Gamal I. Khaleel
Keywords
Carbonation, High-strength concrete (HSC), Reactive powder concrete (RPC), Sorptivty, Supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs), Ultrasonic
Journal
Engineering Journal Mansoura Engineering Journal
Publisher
Not Available
Volume
Manuscript 3259
Issue
Not Available
Pages
Not Available
publication.type
International
Paper Link
Open Link
Supplementary Materials
Not Available
Abstract
The paper reports on the influence of using silica fume (SF) and fly ash (FA) as supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs) on the durability properties of reactive powder concrete (RPC), focusing on sorptivity, ultrasonic pulse velocity (UPV), and carbonation depth. The study also compares the performance of RPC with high-strength concrete (HSC) to assess the relative benefits of RPC. A total of 19 mixtures, including 17 RPC and 2 HSC mixtures, were evaluated. Parameters such as the volume of binder content (45, 50, 55, and 60 %), waterebinder ratios (20, 25, and 30 %), and SCM proportions (0, 10, 20, and 30 %) were varied; these parameters were examined experimentally to evaluate their effect on durability. Results showed that increasing the binder volume ratio from 40 to 60 % reduces water absorption by up to 60 %, with SF mixtures outperforming FA mixtures in water resistance. The sorptivity and water absorption are increased by78and46.6 %,respectively, when the water-to-binder ratio is increased from 20 to 30 % for FA mixtures, whereas for SF mixtures, the optimal performance occurs at a 25 % water-to-binder ratio. The highest reduction in water absorption and sorptivity occurred at a 20 % SCM replacement for SF. UPV increased with higher binder content and SCM replacement with SF mixtures showing superior results. Further, RPC with SF exhibits minimal resistance to CO2 penetration. In comparison to HSC, RPC with SF demonstrates significantly lower sorptivity, up to 63.4 %, 8.12 % higher UPV, and minimal carbonation depth, while HSC shows a 62.5 % greater carbonation depth compared with RPC with FA.
