OSAMA ABDELWAHAB ABDALLA MAHMOUD
Professor
Multislice computed tomography vs. intravenous urography for planning supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A randomised clinical trial
• 2013
Publication Information
Authors
Osama A. El-Wahab a, Magdy A. El-Tabey a,*, Ehab El-Barky a,Shabieb A. El-Baky a, Adel El-Falah a, Medhat Refaat b
Keywords
Not Available
Journal
Not Available
Publisher
Elsevier
Volume
Not Available
Issue
Not Available
Pages
Not Available
publication.type
International
Paper Link
Open Link
Supplementary Materials
Not Available
Abstract
Abstract Objective: To compare the outcome of treatment planning using multislice
computed tomography (CT) or intravenous urography (IVU) for supine percutaneous
nephrolithotomy (PCNL).
Patients and methods: The study included 60 patients with renal stones, all treated
by supine PCNL, between March 2011 and October 2012. The patients were divided
randomly into two equal groups; in group 1 30 patients had the PCNL access
planned based on IVU findings, and in group 2 the PCNL access was planned based
on multislice CT images. All patients were suitable for PCNL, based on a plain
abdominal film and ultrasonography, and with a body mass index of
computed tomography (CT) or intravenous urography (IVU) for supine percutaneous
nephrolithotomy (PCNL).
Patients and methods: The study included 60 patients with renal stones, all treated
by supine PCNL, between March 2011 and October 2012. The patients were divided
randomly into two equal groups; in group 1 30 patients had the PCNL access
planned based on IVU findings, and in group 2 the PCNL access was planned based
on multislice CT images. All patients were suitable for PCNL, based on a plain
abdominal film and ultrasonography, and with a body mass index of