Ahmed Mostafa Ibrahim Abo sakaya
Asst. Professor
Effect of adrenaline concentration in tumescent fluid on intra-operative hemodynamics in liposuction surgery
Egyptian Journal of Anesthesia • 2024
Publication Information
Authors
Ahmed M Abosakaya, Neveen A Kohaf, Mohamed S Elmeligy, Ahmed M Tohamy, Hany Bauiomy
Keywords
Not Available
Journal
Egyptian Journal of Anesthesia
Publisher
Taylor & Francis
Volume
40
Issue
1
Pages
34-39
publication.type
International
Paper Link
Open Link
Supplementary Materials
Not Available
Abstract
Epinephrine in liposuction solution mediated vasoconstriction thus decrease in adrenergic side effects, local anesthetic toxicity, and bleeding. The optimum safe adrenaline concentration was not well investigated.
Aim
This study aimed to compare between adrenaline 1 mg/L and 2 mg/L in tumescent fluid concerning hemodynamics during abdominal liposuction operations.
Methods
Forty cases scheduled for liposuction for abdomen and flanks and body were involved in this randomized, triple-blind, controlled trial. Cases were randomized equally into two groups. Group A (low adrenaline concentration group): received 1 mg per liter of epinephrine. Group B (high adrenaline concentration group): received 2 mg per liter of epinephrine.
Results
Intraoperative heart rate and mean arterial blood pressure at base line were insignificantly different between both groups (p value > 0.05) while at 30, 60, 90 …
Aim
This study aimed to compare between adrenaline 1 mg/L and 2 mg/L in tumescent fluid concerning hemodynamics during abdominal liposuction operations.
Methods
Forty cases scheduled for liposuction for abdomen and flanks and body were involved in this randomized, triple-blind, controlled trial. Cases were randomized equally into two groups. Group A (low adrenaline concentration group): received 1 mg per liter of epinephrine. Group B (high adrenaline concentration group): received 2 mg per liter of epinephrine.
Results
Intraoperative heart rate and mean arterial blood pressure at base line were insignificantly different between both groups (p value > 0.05) while at 30, 60, 90 …
