هاله جمال على على الداعوس
مدرس
Biosecurity Measures, Bacterial Prevalence and Economic Implications of Environmental Mastitis and Hygienic Milking Practices on an Egyptian Dairy Farm
International Journal of Veterinary Science • 2024
معلومات البحث
المؤلفون
Hala El Daous 1, Nehal Alm El Din 2, Eman Nafei 3, Mona Abdallah 4, Amira M Abd-El Hamed
5, Ibrahim M Abdel-Wadoud6, Eman Elgazzar 1, Manar Elkhayat 7* and Eman Hafez
الكلمات المفتاحية
Environmental Mastitis, Hygienic Milking Practices, Biosecurity, Bacterial Prevalence, Economic Losses.
المجلة العلمية
International Journal of Veterinary Science
الناشر
Not Available
المجلد
Not Available
العدد
Not Available
الصفحات
Not Available
publication.type
International
رابط البحث
Not Available
المواد المرفقة
Not Available
الملخص
Hygiene and biosecurity on dairy farms reduce the incidence of mastitis and other infectious diseases. Bovine mastitis,
a common infectious condition, causes cattle culling and reduces milk output and quality, causing significant economic
loss. This study studied the association between environmental mastitis, hygienic milking practices, and dairy cattle
milk output. In addition, a thorough microbiological examination to detect the most important environmental indicator
bacteria that cause mastitis, such as Streptococcus spp., Staphylococcus spp., Pseudomonas spp., and E. coli spp., helps
determine the best mastitis control protocols. Three visits to a dairy farm in Qalioubia governorate, Egypt, yielded 285
samples (186 environmental, 27 workers, 72 milk samples, and swabs). Staphylococcus spp., Streptococcus,
Pseudomonas spp., and E. coli were the farm's most common bacteria, with an average hygiene score of 59%. Cow milk
output peaked in May at 4252L. With clinical mastitis incidence in June and July, it steadily decreased, reaching 3343L
in August in cows with the condition. Bovine Ephemeral Fever (BEF) complicated clinical mastitis during this decrease.
Due to farm workers' lack of biosecurity awareness, several biosecurity and personal hygiene processes in the dairy
farm were flawed, so the farm was infected with BEF, which complicated the losses, as it was $9,348.86/100 cows
because of clinical mastitis and became $53,561.29 after a complication with viral infection, these exorbitant losses
draw the need for training on the importance and the use of these measures. Overall, the results highlighted the critical
role of hygiene and biosecurity measures in reducing mastitis and other infectious diseases on dairy farms, as it identified
a significant link between poor hygiene milking practices and environmental mastitis caused by Streptococcus spp.,
Staphylococcus spp., Pseudomonas spp., and E. coli, which adversely affects milk output and quality. These findings
emphasize the need to enhance biosecurity and hygiene awareness among farm workers to mitigate environmental
mastitis-causing bacteria to improve farm management and productivity.
a common infectious condition, causes cattle culling and reduces milk output and quality, causing significant economic
loss. This study studied the association between environmental mastitis, hygienic milking practices, and dairy cattle
milk output. In addition, a thorough microbiological examination to detect the most important environmental indicator
bacteria that cause mastitis, such as Streptococcus spp., Staphylococcus spp., Pseudomonas spp., and E. coli spp., helps
determine the best mastitis control protocols. Three visits to a dairy farm in Qalioubia governorate, Egypt, yielded 285
samples (186 environmental, 27 workers, 72 milk samples, and swabs). Staphylococcus spp., Streptococcus,
Pseudomonas spp., and E. coli were the farm's most common bacteria, with an average hygiene score of 59%. Cow milk
output peaked in May at 4252L. With clinical mastitis incidence in June and July, it steadily decreased, reaching 3343L
in August in cows with the condition. Bovine Ephemeral Fever (BEF) complicated clinical mastitis during this decrease.
Due to farm workers' lack of biosecurity awareness, several biosecurity and personal hygiene processes in the dairy
farm were flawed, so the farm was infected with BEF, which complicated the losses, as it was $9,348.86/100 cows
because of clinical mastitis and became $53,561.29 after a complication with viral infection, these exorbitant losses
draw the need for training on the importance and the use of these measures. Overall, the results highlighted the critical
role of hygiene and biosecurity measures in reducing mastitis and other infectious diseases on dairy farms, as it identified
a significant link between poor hygiene milking practices and environmental mastitis caused by Streptococcus spp.,
Staphylococcus spp., Pseudomonas spp., and E. coli, which adversely affects milk output and quality. These findings
emphasize the need to enhance biosecurity and hygiene awareness among farm workers to mitigate environmental
mastitis-causing bacteria to improve farm management and productivity.