Zainab Mohamed Abd Elwahab Mahmoud
Lecturer
A Comparative Study between Superficial Erector Spinae Muscle Block versus Deep Erector Spinae Muscle Block for Assessment of Pain Control during Radical Mastectomy Procedures
• 2024
Publication Information
Authors
Elsayed Mohamed Abdelazeem *, Mohmed Fouad Elmeliegy, Islam Ali Shaboob, Zeinab Mohamed Abdelwahab
Keywords
Not Available
Journal
Not Available
Publisher
Not Available
Volume
Not Available
Issue
Not Available
Pages
Not Available
publication.type
Local
Paper Link
Not Available
Supplementary Materials
Not Available
Abstract
Background and Aim of the work: The superficial erector spinae muscle block or deep erector spinae muscle block is an effective approach for analgesia in thoracic surgical and chest trauma, providing excellent pain relief while reducing narcotic requirements. Our study compares superficial erector spinae muscle block versus deep erector spinae muscle block for assessment of pain during radical mastectomy procedures.
Patients and Methods: The patients were randomized into two groups of 30 each. Group I received 20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine superficial to erector spinae muscle at the T4 level, while those in Group II received 20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine deep to erector spinae muscle at the T4 level.
Results: As regards VAS, there was a significant decline [P = 0.001] in the middle VAS in group II when distinguished from group I at 12 h and a statistically significant decline [P = 0.035] at 8 h postoperatively. Also, as regards the moment of truth of first rescue analgesic, skilled was a considerably longer in group II when compared with group I [p value= 0.005], and the total measurement of morphine devouring was considerably lower in group II [6 ± 2 mg/24 h] when distinguished from group I [9 ± 2 mg/24 h].
Patients and Methods: The patients were randomized into two groups of 30 each. Group I received 20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine superficial to erector spinae muscle at the T4 level, while those in Group II received 20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine deep to erector spinae muscle at the T4 level.
Results: As regards VAS, there was a significant decline [P = 0.001] in the middle VAS in group II when distinguished from group I at 12 h and a statistically significant decline [P = 0.035] at 8 h postoperatively. Also, as regards the moment of truth of first rescue analgesic, skilled was a considerably longer in group II when compared with group I [p value= 0.005], and the total measurement of morphine devouring was considerably lower in group II [6 ± 2 mg/24 h] when distinguished from group I [9 ± 2 mg/24 h].
