aya magdy tayel
Asst. Lecturer
Meat By-Products: Utilization, Value Addition, and Sustainability
• 2026
Publication Information
Authors
Aya Tayel Ahmed Hamad, Ahmed G. Ayyad
Keywords
Not Available
Journal
Not Available
Publisher
Not Available
Volume
Not Available
Issue
Not Available
Pages
Not Available
publication.type
International
Paper Link
Not Available
Supplementary Materials
Not Available
Abstract
Meat by-products, often referred to as the “fifth quarter” in the context of red meat processing, encompass
all edible and inedible parts of a slaughtered animal other than the dressed carcass (Toldrá et al.,
2012). The classification of these materials is generally dichotomized into edible and inedible categories,
a distinction heavily influenced by cultural norms, regulatory frameworks, and processing capabilities.
Edible by-products typically include organs such as the liver, heart, kidneys, tongue, and stomach (tripe),
as well as blood and certain fats (Irshad and Sharma, 2015). Conversely, inedible by-products comprise
hides, skins, hair, horns, hooves, teeth, and contents of the gastrointestinal tract. However, the boundary
between these categories is fluid; advancements in processing technology increasingly allow for the
recovery of edible proteins and functional compounds from materials previously deemed inedible waste
(Mora, Reig and Toldrá, 2014).
The volume of by-products generated is substantial, often constituting between 60% and 70% of
the slaughtered animal’s weight depending on the species (Irshad and Sharma, 2015). For instance,
in bovine processing, the dressed carcass yield is approximately 50–60%, leaving nearly half of the
animal’s mass as potential by-product material. This immense volume represents a critical reservoir of
biological material that, if mismanaged, becomes a significant environmental liability rather than an
economic asset.
all edible and inedible parts of a slaughtered animal other than the dressed carcass (Toldrá et al.,
2012). The classification of these materials is generally dichotomized into edible and inedible categories,
a distinction heavily influenced by cultural norms, regulatory frameworks, and processing capabilities.
Edible by-products typically include organs such as the liver, heart, kidneys, tongue, and stomach (tripe),
as well as blood and certain fats (Irshad and Sharma, 2015). Conversely, inedible by-products comprise
hides, skins, hair, horns, hooves, teeth, and contents of the gastrointestinal tract. However, the boundary
between these categories is fluid; advancements in processing technology increasingly allow for the
recovery of edible proteins and functional compounds from materials previously deemed inedible waste
(Mora, Reig and Toldrá, 2014).
The volume of by-products generated is substantial, often constituting between 60% and 70% of
the slaughtered animal’s weight depending on the species (Irshad and Sharma, 2015). For instance,
in bovine processing, the dressed carcass yield is approximately 50–60%, leaving nearly half of the
animal’s mass as potential by-product material. This immense volume represents a critical reservoir of
biological material that, if mismanaged, becomes a significant environmental liability rather than an
economic asset.
