Mohamed Said Mostafa El Melegy
Lecturer
Effect of adrenaline concentration in tumescence solution on intraoperative hemodynamics of liposuction patients: A randomized triple-blind trial
• 2023
Publication Information
Authors
Ahmed M. Abosakaya, Neveen A. Kohaf, Mohamed S. Elmeligy, Ahmed M.
Tohamy & Hany Bauiomy
Keywords
Not Available
Journal
Not Available
Publisher
Not Available
Volume
Not Available
Issue
Not Available
Pages
Not Available
publication.type
Local
Paper Link
Not Available
Supplementary Materials
Not Available
Abstract
Background: Epinephrine in liposuction solution mediated vasoconstriction thus decrease in
adrenergic side effects, local anesthetic toxicity, and bleeding. The optimum safe adrenaline
concentration was not well investigated.
Aim: This study aimed to compare between adrenaline 1 mg/L and 2 mg/L in tumescent fluid
concerning hemodynamics during abdominal liposuction operations.
Methods: Forty cases scheduled for liposuction for abdomen and flanks and body were
involved in this randomized, triple-blind, controlled trial. Cases were randomized equally into
two groups. Group A (low adrenaline concentration group): received 1 mg per liter of epinephrine.
Group B (high adrenaline concentration group): received 2 mg per liter of
epinephrine.
Results: Intraoperative heart rate and mean arterial blood pressure at base line were insignificantly
different between both groups (p value > 0.05) while at 30, 60, 90, and end of surgery
were significantly higher in group B group as opposed to group A (p value < 0.05). Incidence of
sinus tachycardia and PVCs were significantly higher in group B than group A (P < 0.05), while
surgeon satisfaction was comparable between both groups (p value > 0.05).
Conclusions: In liposuction procedures, the safest adrenaline concentration is 1 mg/L as
evidenced by hemodynamics stability and surgeon satisfaction thus even in high volume
liposuction, the adrenaline concentration should not exceed 1 mg/L and should be handled
to cover the used crystalloid solution
adrenergic side effects, local anesthetic toxicity, and bleeding. The optimum safe adrenaline
concentration was not well investigated.
Aim: This study aimed to compare between adrenaline 1 mg/L and 2 mg/L in tumescent fluid
concerning hemodynamics during abdominal liposuction operations.
Methods: Forty cases scheduled for liposuction for abdomen and flanks and body were
involved in this randomized, triple-blind, controlled trial. Cases were randomized equally into
two groups. Group A (low adrenaline concentration group): received 1 mg per liter of epinephrine.
Group B (high adrenaline concentration group): received 2 mg per liter of
epinephrine.
Results: Intraoperative heart rate and mean arterial blood pressure at base line were insignificantly
different between both groups (p value > 0.05) while at 30, 60, 90, and end of surgery
were significantly higher in group B group as opposed to group A (p value < 0.05). Incidence of
sinus tachycardia and PVCs were significantly higher in group B than group A (P < 0.05), while
surgeon satisfaction was comparable between both groups (p value > 0.05).
Conclusions: In liposuction procedures, the safest adrenaline concentration is 1 mg/L as
evidenced by hemodynamics stability and surgeon satisfaction thus even in high volume
liposuction, the adrenaline concentration should not exceed 1 mg/L and should be handled
to cover the used crystalloid solution
