ايه مجدى طايل
مدرس مساعد
Meat By-Products: Utilization, Value Addition, and Sustainability
• 2026
معلومات البحث
المؤلفون
Aya Tayel Ahmed Hamad, Ahmed G. Ayyad
الكلمات المفتاحية
Not Available
المجلة العلمية
Not Available
الناشر
Not Available
المجلد
Not Available
العدد
Not Available
الصفحات
Not Available
publication.type
International
رابط البحث
Not Available
المواد المرفقة
Not Available
الملخص
Meat by-products, often referred to as the “fifth quarter” in the context of red meat processing, encompass
all edible and inedible parts of a slaughtered animal other than the dressed carcass (Toldrá et al.,
2012). The classification of these materials is generally dichotomized into edible and inedible categories,
a distinction heavily influenced by cultural norms, regulatory frameworks, and processing capabilities.
Edible by-products typically include organs such as the liver, heart, kidneys, tongue, and stomach (tripe),
as well as blood and certain fats (Irshad and Sharma, 2015). Conversely, inedible by-products comprise
hides, skins, hair, horns, hooves, teeth, and contents of the gastrointestinal tract. However, the boundary
between these categories is fluid; advancements in processing technology increasingly allow for the
recovery of edible proteins and functional compounds from materials previously deemed inedible waste
(Mora, Reig and Toldrá, 2014).
The volume of by-products generated is substantial, often constituting between 60% and 70% of
the slaughtered animal’s weight depending on the species (Irshad and Sharma, 2015). For instance,
in bovine processing, the dressed carcass yield is approximately 50–60%, leaving nearly half of the
animal’s mass as potential by-product material. This immense volume represents a critical reservoir of
biological material that, if mismanaged, becomes a significant environmental liability rather than an
economic asset.
all edible and inedible parts of a slaughtered animal other than the dressed carcass (Toldrá et al.,
2012). The classification of these materials is generally dichotomized into edible and inedible categories,
a distinction heavily influenced by cultural norms, regulatory frameworks, and processing capabilities.
Edible by-products typically include organs such as the liver, heart, kidneys, tongue, and stomach (tripe),
as well as blood and certain fats (Irshad and Sharma, 2015). Conversely, inedible by-products comprise
hides, skins, hair, horns, hooves, teeth, and contents of the gastrointestinal tract. However, the boundary
between these categories is fluid; advancements in processing technology increasingly allow for the
recovery of edible proteins and functional compounds from materials previously deemed inedible waste
(Mora, Reig and Toldrá, 2014).
The volume of by-products generated is substantial, often constituting between 60% and 70% of
the slaughtered animal’s weight depending on the species (Irshad and Sharma, 2015). For instance,
in bovine processing, the dressed carcass yield is approximately 50–60%, leaving nearly half of the
animal’s mass as potential by-product material. This immense volume represents a critical reservoir of
biological material that, if mismanaged, becomes a significant environmental liability rather than an
economic asset.
