This study aimed to address the actual reality of the open access scientific publishing project for Egyptian journals, which was launched in cooperation between the Academy of Scientific Research and the Egyptian Knowledge Bank (EKB), as well as the stages it went through and describe its components, as well as evaluate the automated system used in the electronic publishing department for Egyptian journals to identify the pros and cons of this The system, in addition to evaluating a group of scientific journals published through the project to determine the extent to which international standards are applied in their production and publication, so that this helps increase the number of Egyptian journals joining global databases and achieve the main goal of the free scientific publishing project and then deviate clearly from reality. In addition to developing solutions that can improve the project outputs represented in the Egyptian journals. The study relied on a combination of two main methodologies, namely the analytical descriptive approach and the evaluative approach. The study includes four chapters that are preceded by a methodological introduction.